this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
548 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

74381 readers
3305 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
548
US broadband grant rules shut out small ISPs and municipalities, advocates say (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The biggest Internet service providers will dominate a $42.45 billion broadband grant program unless the Biden administration changes a rule requiring grant recipients to obtain a letter of credit from a bank, according to a joint statement from consumer advocacy groups, local government officials, and advocates for small ISPs.

The letter sent today to US government officials argues that "by establishing capital barriers too steep for all but the best-funded ISPs, the LOC [letter-of-credit requirement] shuts out the vast majority of entities the program claims to prioritize: small and community-centered ISPs, minority and women-owned ISPs, nonprofits, and municipalities."

The rule is part of the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program that's being administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

yeah if I voted based on a candidate having nothing. nothing at all that I disagreed with. well then I would not vote as no candidate could pass muster. And I will always vote even if the options are limited.

[–] bobman@unilem.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sad watching you defend this.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

where exactly did I defend it? Its just not enough for me to have the next trump/bush/whatevercrazy do way worse.

[–] burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m would be happy with one policy decision I actually agree with. Biden hasn’t done even this.

You are highly misinformed and brainwashed by your media. I know it’s difficult to see but it’s true.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Dude. I have had an anesthia bill this last year that I could point to the law that it has to go through insurnace. I have my own and its a reality that actually effected my life. Throwing out misinformed and brainwashed and media as buzz words does not change reality.