this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
-23 points (29.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3761 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Given the state of the GOP, and who would be beating the "liberal" candidate, this makes a lot of sense. Probably some decent reading for anyone still thinking they just won't vote because Harris isn't progressive enough. She might not be your cup of tea, but I'm betting the other guy is way less so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

They're already moving right. I don't think a lot of Americans fully understand how radicalized their politics have become over the past 20 years or so. Even your most radical leftists, like Bernie, is pretty moderate when compared to politicians in other developed democratic countries. Harris isn't very progressive to begin with, she's just infinitely better than Trump which makes her look like the best candidate in history.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly.

Today's Democrats are Republicans from 20 or 30 years ago.

There is no left in the U.S.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Michael Moore sums it all up in a few minutes from his documentary:

https://youtu.be/MVnIatb7iVI

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The last president before neoliberalism got it's death grip on the party was Carter, and even the "moderates" can't stop talking about how amazing he is, while refusing to ever go back to candidates like him.

Like, the vast majority of voters don't even know the first presidential platform with universal healthcare was Teddy Roosevelt over a century ago.

Anyone that says we "need more time to evaluate" is lying or has no idea what they're talking about

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Carter was the first neoliberal president.

https://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/

The only difference is he actually seems to believe in it.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Harris isn’t very progressive to begin with, she’s just infinitely better than Trump which makes her look like the best candidate in history.

did acab stop being a thing because of her?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

Acab can't stop being a thing until they all stop being bastards.