Programming

17424 readers

60 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Any AI tool to analyse a git repo for malicious code? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 2 months ago by unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de to c/programming@programming.dev

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm trying to feel more comfortable using random GitHub projects, basically.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We already have very efficient string matching tools for those, though

How is a string matching tool going to find a single .?

You’ve given us an example so PoC||GTFO

🙄

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A single character, per your definition, is not blatant malicious code. Stop moving the goalposts.

It’s clear you don’t understand the space and you don’t seem to have any interest in acting in good faith based on your other comments so good luck.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago

I'm not moving any goalposts. The addition of the . was very blatant. They literally just added a syntax error. It went undetected because humans don't have the stamina to exhaustively do code review down to that level. Computers (even AI) don't have that issue.

You are clearly out of your depth here.