Technology

59377 readers

5117 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

742

REPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets (www.windowscentral.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by buckbanzai@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world

212 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What definition are you going by?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Adam Smith's. He pioneered rational choice models in general. Came up with the whole shebang that 20yold econ 101 students love to ignore in favour of "free market is if I get a fat payout".

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And why should I listen to someone that defines a word differently than everyone else?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Adam Smith came up with it. It's also how actual economists use it. Don't confuse that with how business majors, politicians, and generally peddlers of institutionalised market failure use it.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you point to a few examples of economists using it? Obviously I won't count Lemmy users.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

In the hardcore contemporary literature you mostly see more precise language such as perfect competition, (theoretical) situations which are pareto-optimal, which is built on Adam's rational choice models. The maths became more solid, the idea didn't change. They didn't have game theory back then.

And FFS read The Wealth of Nations and see what he thought of monopolists he'd consider our billionaires to be no different than the kings of old. The father of capitalism was out for universal wealth and happiness, not personal enrichment.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You honestly seem obsessed with that adam dude.

I think your problem is that you seem to think that "perfect" mathematical models will ever work in real life.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think your problem is that you seem to think that “perfect” mathematical models will ever work in real life.

I said the exact opposite the whole thread. Are you confusing me with a capitalist or something.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's all you talk about though.

No one cares about Adam when his ideas are frankly stupid. Or at least how you describe them. He might be a solid dude.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's all you fucking asked about.