this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
76 points (94.2% liked)

Steam Deck

6012 readers
1 users here now

Universal community link
!steamdeck@lemmy.ml

Rules

Order

Models

64GB eMMC LCD
256GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe OLED
1TB NVMe OLED

Allowed languages

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would agree except for the 5GHz Wi-Fi. A controller having Wi-Fi is unusual. A controller having 5GHz Wi-Fi is very unusual

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

No problem, just pointing out that it would be unusual for a controller to have 5GHz WiFi. We are guessing what kind of device Valve is making.This device having 5GHz WiFi lowers the chances of it being a controller.

[–] 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No problem, but a WiFi controller is a bit like reinventing a worse wheel

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You say that, but Amazon made a WiFi remote and game controller for the second generation of the Fire TV

What do you mean it was hounded by performance issues

How dare you bring up the abbreviated battery life

[–] anon232@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The steam controller has a bluetooth mode you can activate upon turning it on.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bluetooth I understand and makes perfect sense in a controller. Is a very common way to connect a human interface device wirelessly. It is a direct connection and can be very lower power and doesn't need to transfer alot of data. Not only did the Steam controller support Bluetooth like you mentioned but i believe the recent Xbox and PS5 controllers support Bluetooth as well. I think even the Nintendo Wii controllers were Bluetooth.

WiFi doesn't make much sense in a controller when Bluetooth already exists. Unless the controller has features that would benefit using WiFI over Bluetooth.

For example I could see maybe an advantage in a steam steaming/steam remote play situation. Instead of a controller going Bluetooth to local device and that local device passing the commands to the remote device, the controller could talk directly over the network to the remote device saving some latency for a more responsive experience. But I don't know why they would pick 5GHz that is more of a higher bandwidth application as far as i understand. You don't need that for sending basic controller commands 2.4GHz would be more than enough. Maybe it has something to do with Latency if your 2.4GHz network is congested you could to go with the less congested 5GHz frequency.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that is a good reason.

And looking at the documentation it just saids it uses the frequency band of WiFi not that it uses WiFI. https://www.rra.go.kr/ko/license/A_b_popup.do?app_no=202317210000256753

translated

Specific low-power wireless devices (wireless devices for wireless access systems including wireless LAN (5150-5350 MHz, 5470-5850 MHz frequency band))