this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
74 points (90.2% liked)

politics

19101 readers
4813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For some reason, this gives me echoes of the labor union protests, but I can’t figure out why business owners would be so against protests in support of human rights for Palestinians.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's about rich donors. There are a small number of influential and wealthy Jewish donors that give a lot of money to universities. There are a far larger number of wealthy religious conservative donors who are more interested in the advancement of Israel for their apocalypse beliefs. Some are just old wealthy donors who grew up in an era when Israel was much more of an underdog than a brutal colonial occupier (or at least could more easily be portrayed as such.)

High-level admins like university presidents spend most of their time hobnobbing with wealthy donors and potential donors. Their primary job IS to secure donations. That's what they spend the vast majority of their time thinking about and prioritizing. And those donors are perfectly willing to cut off those dollars if they see things happening on a campus they don't like.

Universities have let private donors gain way too much power over them. Academic freedom has been severely degraded by their over-reliance on wealthy benefactors. That is unfortunately just the sad state of modern academia.