this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
12 points (66.7% liked)

Anarchism

1430 readers
2 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
12
What is your voting red line? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This goes to all the peeps who support parliamentary voting as a valid political action.

If your society has been steadily progressing towards fascism for decades regardless of your voting (like the USA has been), is there any point, any action which will convince you that voting ultimately doesn't work?

Is so, what is it? What would your government have to do for you to acknowledge that voting doesn't matter? For many people, it was of course, supporting genocide (which is why so many states desperately try to deny a genocide is ongoing). But if genocide isn't, what is yours?

Eventually a society which has been slowly progressing towards fascism regardless of voting, will become fascist. And we all know what comes after that. There's always one thing where I think even the most hardcore parliamentarian will agree that voting ultimately didn't work: When they're personally being force-marched to the mass grave-sites.

Would that be your point? Or does it come earlier? If so, when?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

I really don't get this logical framework where voting is doing some kind of favor for the politician class.

Generally speaking, politicians (and one of the two US parties in particular, additional video from the second most recent Republican president because they are two in a row on this now) consider elections and voters to be a problem for them.