this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1197 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A vote isn’t an endorsement, you are not personally responsible for the actions of the people you vote for

I dont agree. When soneone says they will do something terrible and you vote for them anyway, you have enabled it and have some of that outcome on your hands.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Then you commit to never voting. If you vote for Bernie people will say "oh he endorsed joe biden, he is complicit" but you don't get to choose the battlefield only the outcome of the battle.

Fundamentally a percentage of politicians will lie, or lack resources to fulfil promises. There is simply nobody on earth that can uphold the promise of never doing something terrible, even on accident.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I reject the idea that war crimes are always the only choice we have in any election. But if thats your slant, OK, why not push for a third option-- getting Harris to stop the shipments by applying voter pressure on her. The only time politicians care about what the elctorate thinks at all is right before a close election, like right now. Why are so many dems not pushing her to take a better stand than she has had?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I actually think stopping shipments is not going to achieve anything. Polling shows its popular (so I disagree that dems aren't pushing Kamala, Biden, etc) but if Israel just changes arms suppliers its easily undermined. And we don't even know if like there's conditions on shipments like "we won't use nuclear weapons on Gaza if the shipments continue" There's just too much we don't know to vote based solely on another country's actions.

I think a better policy is to just take in gazan refugees and make it harder for hardline israelis to visit the US. Do the pullout from vietnam movie script. Of course this is a less popular policy and it is one dems likely aren't getting pressure to do, even though its low risk and high preservation of human life.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What exactly are you accusing of being a lie?

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The quote I am replying to is at the top of my reply..

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think you misread the quoted text because its referencing a non-quoted line