this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Linux Gaming

15789 readers
5 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
Quintus@lemmy.ml
mudle@lemmy.ml
44
Is AMD really that much better? (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 1 year ago by SpicyTofuSoup@lemmy.sdf.org to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey everyone,

I'm currently rocking a 3080 I bought second hand in my Arch Linux rig. It works great under xorg but not so much wayland. There are a number of bugs and gaming performance is worse. I would like to use wayland in general for the mixed refresh rates with dual monitors. My question is: Is AMD really that much better than Nvidia? Is the AMD experience issue free with wayland? Also, how is hardware encoding with AMD? I'm particularly curious how performance is for game streaming with sunshine. I currently use nvenc hardware encoding which is amazing and feels like there is no latency. Does AMD have a similar experience?

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoXPhasma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

but I have used the video encode hardware on AMD cards via VAAPI and it was competent and much faster than x264/x265 on the CPU.

Yes, it's faster than the CPU, which is no surprise, but the quality is incredibly worse than NVENC. I switched to AMD earlier this year and I knew that the AMD video encoder wouldn't match NVENC, but the difference is much bigger than I've ever thought.