this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
174 points (94.8% liked)

BestOfLemmy

7194 readers
2 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 53 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

They added a line to the bot that includes Wikipedia’s stance on a source. And Wikipedia doesn’t consider MBFC to be reliable, so the bot reports that.

If you scroll below that, MBFC rates themselves as maximally reliable, which I’m sure is based off of a rigorous and completely neutral assessment.

Edit: although, reading the links in question they don’t seem to correspond to what the bot is saying. Perhaps this is some sort of mistake in how it was coded.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It's not a mistake, just confusing UX. The text in question comes from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBFC

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It doesn’t though. Or at least, I didn’t see anything resembling that on that page. If you can find it, let me know. It’s possible I missed it.

[–] taipan@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, it seems to me like it should link here rather than to the main article.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)