LibertyLizard

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure BC, VA, and CO are not going along with that.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago

Aren’t they all scams?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

No. I think it’s a pretty shitty thing to do unless you had a reason to feel unsafe, which I personally never have.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I think democrats would, for the most part. Perhaps less enthusiastically, but since they hate Trump, I think it would not be a major issue.

The question is, how would low-information unaffiliated voters respond to having a socialist in the ballot? This is a difficult question to answer. Traditionally socialism is a bad word in US politics, albeit less so with younger voters.

Personally I don’t really buy the “Bernie would have won” stuff but there’s really only one way to find out.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s such a broad body of work that it’s hard to list all of the issues I have it it. I guess the biggest issue is just that Marx’s writings were an early attempt at describing a more rigorous case for social reform before more scientific theories of social change and economics were developed. So while his ideas were groundbreaking and innovative at the time they were written, not all of them have held up or are relevant to today’s world. And yet I don’t see many Marxists who have been willing to seriously dissect his ideas and take the useful ideas while discarding the bad or irrelevant ones. And in fact, those few who are willing to take a more critical stance are often ostracized and deemed “revisionists” which strikes me as a frankly absurd accusation. If you are not revising your theories then they are no longer theories but mere dogma, and that seems to be the state of mainstream Marxism today.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don’t obey in advance. With the exception of the Supreme Court, most other systems and protections remain in place and may continue to exist regardless of Trump’s intentions, especially if they are fought for and protected.

But direct action of the type the author is discussing has been very successful across many contexts, including brutal dictatorships with no human rights guarantees. So the whole thrust of your comment fails to grapple with the real history of popular struggle.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Haha yeah he’s not too memorable otherwise but it’s a funny mistake since Romney and Trump hate each other.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Romney? Did you mean Perry?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why do you think he was selected for AG?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago

Biden has backed Israel since Hamas-led gunmen attacked the country in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 hostages. Since then, more than 43,500 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed in Gaza, with 2 million displaced people and much of the strip reduced to rubble.

How mysterious. I wonder who killed them?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I realize I misunderstood what you were saying. Yes I agree.

I don’t find Marxism very compelling personally but I agree that material conditions certainly do have their influence on many things, perhaps including this issue.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 days ago (5 children)

And yet in local races, primaries, ballot initiatives, progressive candidates and issues all lost. Almost every issue I voted on went the other way. So that has been my experience with California, that it is not very progressive. Admittedly this was a particularly bad election but similar things have happened before.

 

A well-researched video that explains why some dense urban areas are quite expensive.

TL;DW: Despite a substantial historic housing stock, our most expensive cities have built very little housing in recent years, leading to very low vacancy rates and high prices. Ramping up housing construction will be a necessary part of solving the affordability crisis.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/13574268

A really innovative study that went beyond statistical association and actually planted trees in low-tree neighborhoods and measured the impacts.

After the plantings, the research team reassessed residents' health. They found that those living in the greened area had 13-20% lower levels of a biomarker of general inflammation, a measure called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) than those living in the areas that did not receive any new trees or shrubs. Higher levels of hsCRP are strongly associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease and are an even stronger indicator of heart attack than cholesterol levels. Higher CRP levels also indicate a higher risk of diabetes and certain cancers.

A reduction of hsCRP by this percentage corresponds to nearly 10-15% reduction in the risk of heart attacks, cancer or dying from any disease.

Although several previous studies have found an association between living in areas of high surrounding greenness and health, this is the first study to show that a deliberate increase in greenness in the neighborhood can improve health.

 
 

Pretty pathetic for democrats to be collaborating with Exxon in 2024.

 

Great work by residents. But next time they need to have a more organized force to keep the city at bay, bring in the media, call their reps in the city council, etc.

You can’t beat the government in force but you can embarrass them until they give up.

 
 

This picture was too cute for me to resist!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16316375

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16316322

In Indonesia, women ranger teams go on patrol to slow deforestation

view more: next ›