Work Reform

10000 readers

553 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

733

There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage? (www.counterpunch.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So some dude accused me of being a troll and I'm certainly not, and I'm certainly interested in this topic. I just care about taking actual actions to affect change.

I believe this would shield the hyper wealthy from further fairness, they would hide behind this.

I further believe this would be corrupted to manipulate true laborers by targeting different professions and tax classes after the fact.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

So we have common ground on the fact the primary focus is the robber barons. Any changes should start with addressing the avenues only the robber barons have to avoid taxation and work their way down.

But slippery sloping the fact there are people out there with millions of dollars of "salary" is also nonsense. CEO's do not add that kind of value, there is a big network component at work.

Then there are several different scales for the first 100K of income to differentiate, but then above that it stops.. F- that.. if there is a top scale it should be at 99%. Just watch how quick there will be intermediate scales. But no one will be able to convince me that salaries above a certain amount can be defended. Where that amount is.. I don't know.. it can be high.. but a ceiling is easily defendable.