this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
289 points (97.4% liked)

CanadaPolitics

1893 readers
6 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not surprised at all. They just want us to get angry and vote the current government out.

I hope people learned from Ontario but probably not.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is what our "democracy" has morphed into .... we are no longer told who to vote for .... we are instead told who NOT to vote for.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All to ensure that we never actually talk to the person we do vote for. "Oh, yeah, the problems are totally a result of you chosing the wrong party and not because the person you elected isn't a mind reader and was left to guess about what you wanted."

[–] Navy@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I mean you can talk to the people you elect, it just doesn't do anything. I talked to my MPP just the other day about if he would support back to work legislation for teachers, they've been working for over a year without a contract and all he would say about is "we're trying to keep students in the classroom". He never did give me a straight answer about it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That's just pruning the worse ideas until we have a clear last-loser.

We should not have people voting on a single issue (for the cons, it's whether corporations and rich people should continue to skate on their tax obligation) but "people vs monoliths" is kinda it.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope people learned from Ontario but probably not.

Learned to not elect the federal Progressive Conservatives? I think they learned that back in 2002. Remember, the party gave up after that?