this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
321 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
4613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This has to be the idea of the century

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quicky@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

No interest in Windows at all, but Copilot is actually a great name for what the product is supposed to be/being marketed as. Windows Intelligence sounds like a return to the very old-school long-winded style of Microsoft branding.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Agreed, Copilot was one of if not the best named AI I think. Why they would want to rebrand it to something so bland so quickly is beyond me

[–] vrek@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have no love for Microsoft but their naming is one of the worst parts... Let's make a game console! We'll call it Xbox!... That sold well let make another! We'll call it xbox360... Time for a refresh on the gaming console! We'll call it Xbox one... Another refresh but this time let's make two versions! We'll call them Xbox one series s and x box one series s!

Or our popular ide is bloated and people are asking for a light weight ide... What's our current ide called? Visual studio but alot of people abbreviate it to vs! Let's call the new one vscode! Do they have anything in common or share functionality or shortcuts? No

Don't get me started on windows.. 3.1... 95...nt...98...2000...me...vista...7...8....10...11 like wtf???

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least Xbox made some sense, it was originally going to be called the DirectXbox, thankfully they shortened the name to something catchier.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes... And the sequels? I still don't know if Xbox one s or x box one x is the higher end model....

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably the more expensive one.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Granted but still bad naming convension. In comparison which is better Playstation 4 or Playstation 5?

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

NT was a fully seperate product from 95 and 98, using a different kernel. 95 -> 98 -> Me was the old kernel, NT -> 2000 -> XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 8 -> 10 -> 11 is the other line. Me was a play on Millenium Edition, so that line was just numbered by year. The NT series names are a bit wonky, though. The reason for skipping 9 involves legacy program support and bad coding practices from ye olde programmers. 7 was kind of an arbitrary number to begin with, though.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

7 was the version if you only counted the "best ofs" Windows 3, 95, XP, Vista, 7.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

In addition to ME and NT, they also had CE.

CEMENT.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I understand the whole different kernal thing but that's the type of thing that the average consumer shouldn't have to know to follow your program naming scheme.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I just enjoy that I can call them "xbone"

Because it's Microsoft and they have to compulsively rename things every few years.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Cortana was the best branding, though I understand only resonated within certain circles.

[–] vin@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe they didn't want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion

load more comments (15 replies)