Consider this... If you work at the unemployment office and get let go, you still need to go back to work the next day
vrek
Ok I actually had to look up that pun...
It's not Chinese but caliope mori does this alot with Japanese. A lot of it is pop rap and she is a ytuber so it may not be your style. She's incredibly talented though, she can do multiple simultaneous rhyme schemes while jumping between the two languages.
Hasn't md5 been cracked for like 2 decades? Now if they could Crack like aes-256 in under an hour this would be a different conversation.
That's good. I was concerned this was going to become a repeat thing like so much health procedures are.
Will this need to become a regular thing or is it a one time fix?
I thought I read there was also a british man who was a member of the staff, I will look and try to get a source to back that up.
Interesting.
I was actually going to argue that the monkey selfie lawsuit went against that but I double checked some sources and I was wrong. The court actually found exactly as you described and that since a non-human didn't create the media it could not be copyrighted.
Today I learned... Thanks!
I agree but to give some context to the staff escaping, this probably was started because one of the people airvaced to a hospital was a staff member. They didn't "escape" they got sick and needed emergency medical treatment. I can believe someone heard a staff member was no longer on board and warped that into staff "escaping".
? I'm confused... What does my post have to do with placebo? I know the placebo effect and how double blind studies work. But it has little to do with that statement that proving a claim should be the requirement instead of requiring proof of a negative.
If I claim you're an armadillo, proof should be on me to provide evidence of you being an armadillo. You shouldn't have to prove you are not one. Any claim on anything with no evidence to show it is true should be discarded.
It has nothing to do with placebo.
I believe that in theory but has that been established by case law or precedent? I'm interested because I have not heard that. I could totally see law makers say companies can hold copyright, company owns Ai system, company now owns the copyright to what Ai made.
Not quite this exact case but I love showing people https://github.com/mame/quine-relay
It has 128 languages, it starts with ruby which prints out its own source code in Scala, then the Scala program executes to generate the next source code, repeat for 128 languages and eventually returns to the original ruby code.
For extra fun, look at the source code on a large monitor.