vrek

Depends on the show...some of them, no it's not because it's improper it's because they are super annoying to watch as an adult. I'm thinking stuff like team Umizoomi, Dougie and such.

Stuff for early teens is typically ok, like Steven universe or teen titans or adventure time. But when you go down to shows for the under 7 crowd...yeah the shows are horrible.

Oh that's fine then

Probably true, it was just a joke though.

Where does vegetable oil come from? Vegetables!

Where does olive oil come from? Olives!

Where does baby oil come from? Uh... Oh no!

Yes, it's called conflict of interest. Your question is a loaded question because it states that the officer "kills" the victim and it was "unjustly". Let's a officer is accused of causing the death of the victim. The cousin lawyer may not do all the work required to defend against the allegations or may hide evidence that he is innocent since it doesn't fit what they want.

On the other hand, maybe cousin lawyer hated the victim. Maybe the cousin slept with the lawyer's husband. Maybe the lawyer suspects she can get a payout in a civil court later if the cop is convicted.

The risks of these occurring are so great that this shouldn't even be considered and I think would be banned by the bar association.

Back then they were "west Francia fries" as France wasn't found yet, otherwise a hostorically accurate comic.

Can you just have the board made as a square and then just cut it out with a jig saw?

Lucky you didn't have to get a new home with the grease + high heat = fire situation...

Was it an older person? I remember when a big selling point of chrome was you could search Google from the address bar rather than going to Google.com. On a related note, have you seen my walker?

They are real but rare. Situations that change society as a whole. For example creation of printing press which spread both religion and literacy. Or creation of the combustion engine which lead to cars and trains resulting in the society spawl we now live in. Or the discovery of germ theory which revolutionized medicine. Or the the west India shipping company started selling rights to some of the profits of a shop if people gave them money early so they could afford the ship and the trip, effectively creating stock markets(especially the futures market). Or creation of the transistor instead of vacuum tubes.

People claim things are paradigm shifts so others will give them money but most typically aren't. Like 3d tvs were supposed to be a paradigm shift about 15 years ago, now when did you last even see a 3d movie or see a 3d TV for sale in a store? Vr was supposed to be a paradigm shift for games but it's still incredibly niche due to price, downsides of current tech and lack of software (software isn't developed because there's not a consumer base and there's not a consumer base because there's no software)

If your company was anything like mine find a group of people who you work well with in your normal departments and try to use them whenever possible. For example basically every document released needed a signature from manufacturing, R&D, regulatory, quality. Technically I would contact the manager of each department with quick overview and ask them to assign someone, but I would also include a quick note like "I would appreciate if John could be assigned to this if he has availability". Typically I would also typically of already contacted John and checked if he had availability and if it was within his ability, typically they were willing but sometimes was told stuff like "I would love to but I'm on vacation for 2 weeks starting Monday" or "I could but I haven't work on fault tolerance stack up analysis since college, I recommend Tim as he can give a more thorough review of your analysis". All good things to know before starting out on a project.

Also if you need something done quickly prepare ahead and alert everyone and typically people will comply but don't use this too often. For example one time we had an improvement project, we were told we could use a Friday but report had to be completed and released before Friday morning or people's surgeries would need to be delayed(long story how we got in that situation). I wrote the whole report the week before assuming everything went smoothly, only thing missing was the specific numbers from the test. I sent it out the week before and asked for a pre-review so everyone agreed on the verbiage. I wrote a macro script to do all the analysis and verified it work with previous data sets compared to manual analysis. Test took 6 hours to run, finishing of report took 10 minutes, sent out for review to all signatories and cc'd my boss, the director and the dvp emphasizing urgency. Dvp replied all throwing his weight behind it. Everything was approved and released with an hour to spare before eod. I only did that sort of thing 5 times over 8 years in that role so people respected my request. I know people who said everything was urgent and no matter what the real priority was it got put into the normal queue for most people. Typically I budgeted a week just for reviews in my timeline, we got that one done in about 35 minutes.

I used to be in medical device, be aware everything takes forever. Minor changes were atleast 6 months. I added in a step to have an operator look at some component under a microscope for damage to increase yield. Basically if the component was damaged it wasn't detectable till much later and cost went from about 5 dollars to about 800. It took 9 months to implement and we didn't even have to buy anything or hire anyone.