Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers

473 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

171

British Just Stop Oil activists in London respond to Donald Trump's election (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, it’s my favorite form of protest: easily ignorable, and sparking no conversation.

The worst part about Vincent Van Soup is that people still talk about it two years later. Or maybe the worst part is that it still prompts people to ask “Is climate change really so dire that they were justified?” and have very long conversations about it.

Terrible!

I prefer Orange Paint. Nobody will remember Orange Paint by tomorrow, and that’s what I call a good protest.

[+] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org -13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The worst part about Vincent Van Soup is that people still talk about it two years later.

Yeah, talking about what shitheads those people were, not about any meaningful action on the actual issue.

Is the orange paint a good protest? I don't think so. But at least it actually is a protest. The action being taken is actually related to the message they want to convey.

Throwing soup at a painting is not protesting or activism. It's just vandalism while wearing a t-shirt.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"the oppressor doesn't get to tell the oppressed how to protest"

Only tangentially related here but the principle remains

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Really, you're comparing morality the well deserved comeuppance for petty vandalism to the systematic oppression of an entire race? Wow ... that's fucking disgusting, you should be ashamed.

But no point in further arguing with that level of delusion. Have a day.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago

Throwing soup on a FRAME is hardly vandalism, especially considering no real damage was done.

Crazily enough though, we still talk about it. No one will remember this orange paint.

Its nice of you to so succinctly prove their point.