this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
181 points (92.1% liked)

Socialism

5182 readers
21 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whithom@discuss.online 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You’re half right. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen at all. Personally I think, one person, one house—that’s it. Corporations can’t own SFH. Taxed on empty units, taxed on high rates.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

yup tax on empty units in general would help a lot including rent prices, if you want to not pay the extra tax, better lower your rent to a point people can afford. So the tax needs to be high enough for this decision to be made.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Personally I think, one person, one house

What's a family to do?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago

I'm guessing they mean maximum one person one house, so a person can't own two houses but many people can choose to live in one house.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 5 days ago

Obviously you have a house for your baby 🙄