this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
124 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19101 readers
3444 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In Wayne County, Arab American precincts rejected Kamala Harris, with Biden receiving 82% of the vote in 2020 and Harris only 23% in 2024.

Trump’s outreach to Arab American and Muslim communities, including visits to Dearborn and Hamtramck, contributed to his increased support.

Harris’s performance in Dearborn, where she received only 13% of the vote in the south end, reflects the backlash against Biden’s handling of foreign policy in the Middle East.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZK686@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This is crazy because typically Republicans are more supportive of Israel..

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (7 children)

To Arabs with families in Gaza the worst is already happening. Entire branches of families have been wiped out. Trump quite literally can not be any worse for them than Biden. And Harris failed to meaningfully distance herself from Biden's policies on Gaza. So they stayed home. This isn't shocking, it's an entirely human response.

[–] Mjpasta710@midwest.social -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're welcome to hold an opinion. I could have believed you were ill informed and not actively acting in bad faith.

You continued responding after this comment was posted illustrating how you were actively lying and trying to subvert the facts.

https://midwest.social/post/19205574/13516874

It's very clear from those paying attention she did take a different position from the same as Trump.

Stop lying.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

First of all I'm not omniscient. I don't see everything that's posted. But please go read what I said again. I did not say I believed her stance to be the same as Biden's. I said she failed to meaningfully separate herself from Biden's policies.

She said the exact same thing Biden was saying while he was sending 2,000 pound bombs to Israel.

And Jordanlund is wrong about the "defensive" weapons. The only defensive thing we send is the iron dome missiles. We also send everything from bullets to tank shells to plane bombs. None of which are purely defensive.

She could have used messaging along the lines of, "I believe our military aid requires more stringent investigations into units receiving it." But for whatever reason she didn't. The pro Palestinian lobby was very clear about what they wanted to hear from her in order to vote for her and she did not meet that bar.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)