this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
959 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5227 readers
434 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Can’t you takeover a blockchain by owning the majority of a block chain, or by having a majority of the processing power to compute hashes?

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago (7 children)

If you had 51% of the world's computing power (to blockchains using proof of work) yes you could forge records, from what I could wrap my head around about blockchains.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You don't need 51% of the world's power though, just 51% of the power of people who care about how the system works. Most people using block chain cryptos don't care at all, so the threshold is a tiny percentage of the user base.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s proof of work. Proof of stake is you just need more than everyone else, right?

[–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It works more like loaning money and then receiving interest, except you are loaning crypto to the network and then you get it back, plus some, after a certain period of time

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Is the network not considered a third party

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)