this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
558 points (94.1% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah, both sides amiright?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Time for the 2nd stage of FAaFO for all those that fucked around.

No both sides were not equally bad choices for trying to stop the slaughter of non-combatants.

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Non-combatants have been getting slaughtered none stop for over a year now with the help of the Biden/Harris admin.

If they were the better choice they could have demonstrated that, with actions not words.

Bidens 30 day deadline came and went and nothing changed because Biden doesn't care about innocent life and the dem leadership are all in the pocket of aipac https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/11/biden-israel-palestine-gaza-aid-30-day-warnings-blinken-toothless/

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not going to debate what Biden (since as VP Harris has no actual power to do anything) has done or not done nor your opinions of what he's done or not done. I do take issue that you think he doesn't care, at a human level I just don't think that's true. What he's done to express that humanity given geopolitical realities is the real issue.

But anyone who actually thinks Trump cares at all about innocent life, or anyone's life but his own, or cares about the legacy he leaves behind may find themselves rethinking that opinion in the coming year.

Now that the election is over, I truly do hope something good gets done. We of course won't know what Harris could have accomplished, but we'll certainly know if Trump tries and if he succeeds. Keeping fingers crossed.

ETA: I'll just drop this here https://www.reuters.com/world/us/muslims-who-voted-trump-upset-by-his-pro-israel-cabinet-picks-2024-11-15/

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do take issue that you think he doesn’t care, at a human level I just don’t think that’s true.

How would you have any read on his personal feelings at all? And why would you care that they're being besmirched? His actions are what matter to the world and the only path by which any of us has to judge him.

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right I have no more intimate knowledge of his internal feelings than you do. I have however seen enough humanity in him to believe he has more empathy than Trump who has a very well documented history of narcissism bordering on psychopathy.

As for my "care" of his humanity being besmirched, I don't actually. My issue was with your questionable assertion that he doesn't care and the implication that maybe (but maybe not) you actually think Trump cares more.

As for his actions as the president of the united states, who has the full weight of international geopolitics, national politics, and an election to consider, I'd say the job is no where near as simple as you'd like it to seem and as much as I hate (or don't hate but am resigned) to admit it, there is a limit to what the United States can actually do to make a difference in Gaza that might not have other undesirable results.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First, I'm not the guy you were replying to.

Second, there may be a limit to what the United States can do in Gaza, but we know for sure Biden didn't ever even try to reach it. It's a much more strained interpretation to believe a highly empathic person cared deeply about the harm he was causing and did practically nothing to reduce it than to believe someone who has spent their entire life pursuing greater personal power, including multiple times where he supported wars in the Middle East, might be a bit of a sociopath. Making the former work requires inventing these unobservable stresses and reasons to explain why a seemingly immoral response is in fact secretly moral, while the latter lines up with our general understanding of people at the highest levels of power and the plain observations. The morality of a genocide is not complex.

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Didn't say what was or was not moral or the complexity of genocide. I said that diplomacy is much more complex than either side wants to admit when they are emotionally invested (for very good reasons!) in painting the other side of the argument as heartless / savage / inhuman.

Regardless, my central premise hasn't changed: I hope the whole situation can be brought to a peaceful conclusion as fast as possible with a framework for lasting peace. BUT, I don't think Trump is the one to make it happen, I don't even think the US can actually make it happen, and I worry there are a lot of US voters who will suddenly be realizing the Leopard actually ate THEIR face. But hey, maybe Huckabee and Stefanik will decide the Palestinians are real and care about them more than Biden or Harris and Trump won't lift all military restrictions on Israel on the 1st day in office like the referenced article [shrug] I actually do hope so, but I obviously am not holding my breath.