Fediverse

17729 readers

134 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

What is the fediverse?
- Short ver.
- Full ver.
Fediverse Platforms
How to run your own community

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml

wakest@lemmy.ml

Christine Lemmer-Webber, co-author of ActivityPub, on BlueSky (lazysoci.al)

submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Bluesky is called a decentralized network and uses the term federation. The problem is that their technology, from the point of view of power dynamics, is not decentralized at all,” emphasizes Christine Lemmer-Webber, an expert on decentralized social protocols. “The use of some decentralisation techniques, but the decentralized service itself is not today. There is one big company that controls the flow of information, and without which this network cannot operate at the moment.”

This does not mean that moving from X/Twitter to Bluesky is a bad idea. “I appreciate that Bluesky wants to build a service that can quickly fully replace Twitter. But I don’t think they should claim that this service is decentralized and instead focus on the date of a “trustworthy way”.

Source: https://oko.press/ucieczka-z-twittera-przyszlosc-mediow-spolecznosciowych

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] volkris@qoto.org -16 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

@sabreW4K3 Well that's a pretty nonsensical take.

The use of some decentralization techniques? It is decentralized because it uses decentralization techniques, and that's all there is to it. It is far more decentralized than this platform because of the techniques it uses. It focuses on users instead of centralizing around instances.

From the point of view of power dynamics? GTFO with that BS.

No, BlueSky is decentralized. It is more decentralized than this platform. These people are trying really really hard to bend things and find problems that don't really match reality.

And they need to be called out over it.

I really wish this platform was more decentralized, but that's not how the engineers designed it, and we need to call them out over it.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 12 hours ago

of course it is a qotoer

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 17 hours ago

BlueSky is decentralized. It is more decentralized than this platform.

Could you please elaborate on this, or point me to where I could read up more on this? It's the first time I've seen this claim and would like to know more.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I hate to be that guy, but since you're dismissing the opinion of one of the people that designed the first decentralised social media protocol, I'm going to assume it's because you're better qualified to make the assessment. Can I ask, what are your qualifications?

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 10 points 16 hours ago

trust me, bruh

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 11 points 20 hours ago

@volkris@qoto.org @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al there's absolutely more to being decentralized than just using "decentralization techniques". Those techniques just mean it could be decentralized in theory but isn't at all in practice. At least not for now.

It's like saying your service is "decentralized" even though you run and control it all because you use load-balancing with your web servers.