this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
534 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
4429 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

All of them, plus storage batteries are under much less abuse and are different chemistry that lasts a lot longer.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I didn't mean they only last 2 years but battery degradation is a pretty common and known thing.

By a quick search I didn't find any claim of storage battery lifetimes outside of 10-15 years, so there doesn't seem to be a breakthrough in tech I wasn't aware of. 15 years is hardly the lifetime of a house, so you certainly don't "buy only once".

Solar panels also don't work indefinitely but their efficiency degradation is more on par with the lifetime of major parts of the building, like the roof itself.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Sure, but the cost of batteries is at the point where even with replacements every 10-15 years you'll spend less than you would buying power from the grid.

The comparison commodity was Gas. Does something that can only be consumed once even have a lifetime?