this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
362 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
362
DOJ to ask judge to force Google to sell off Chrome, Bloomberg reports (neuters.de)
submitted 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe as a whole package, but node.js servers are ubiquitous and have a ton of stakeholders that have nothing to do with web browsers.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What does Chrome have to do with a node.js server?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Same JS engine, same maintainers, same iron-grip control by Google.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

I've got no idea what you're talking about here.