this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1336 points (96.8% liked)

Fediverse

17710 readers
6 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The best part of the fediverse is that anyone can run their own server. The downside of this is that anyone can easily create hordes of fake accounts, as I will now demonstrate.

Fighting fake accounts is hard and most implementations do not currently have an effective way of filtering out fake accounts. I'm sure that the developers will step in if this becomes a bigger problem. Until then, remember that votes are just a number.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dimspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Instances can just defederate with those servers

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That can only be done after the fact, and people can just create new ones constantly can they not? There needs to be a different pro-active defense to watch for the signs of manipulation and counter them as they happen.

[–] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whitelist federation is one strategy. Rather than defaulting to federation with every instance a proactively moderated instance would only federate with approved requests.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would kill small instances though, definitely personal ones for those who want to run their own. Once places like lemmy and kbin get big enough there is no way they're going to go through and hand-federate every tiny new instance that pops up. There'd be no way to tell which ones are personal and which ones would be used for manipulation?

[–] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can still read posts witjout federation. And you could still comment on theirs within your home instance. You just wouldn’t be able to post within their instance.

load more comments (1 replies)