this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
745 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59608 readers
3423 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Automotive research firm finds that Tesla has higher frequency of deadly accidents than any other car brand

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n_emoo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hard disagree on this one. The regenerative braking has a learning curve yes, but the pros outweigh the cons imo. When you brake (in a traditional car or an EV), you are wearing out yor brake pads, turning friction into heat. Done right, renerative braking means almost all energy is captured back, and even lower maintenance by not bothering the brake pad.

It takes getting used to, you hate it at first, which is why tesla has an option to disable it, but there is a reason why most people who own Teslas use it, and other EVs are getting it as well.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

It's like engine braking in an ICE-powered car in terms of its effect on the car's dynamics.

there is a reason why most people who own Teslas use it

Yeah, it's because they go with the default.

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Regenerative braking is good thing, yes .But implementing it as one pedal driving is terrible. Other OEMs like Ford or VW blend regenerative braking into the brake pedal of their EVs such that it feels exactly like a normal car. The friction pads are there for either emergency braking or for bringing the car to a final stop after slowing down.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

Toyota's been doing that for over 25 years in its hybrids.

It's an excellent, highly reliable system.

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I drive exclusively in 1-pedal. It's a pretty quick transition.

Probably easiest to make an analogy to the transition to analog sticks for gaming.

It was a bit difficult but, once you get the nuance, it's pretty game changing.

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I drive my ID.4 exclusively in normal drive mode. I tried one pedal driving and hated it. I don’t understand the hype. To each their own. My point was that regenerative braking doesn’t depend on one pedal driving.

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I haven't driven the id.4, but our car has a visual indicator that shows the percentage of regenerative braking efficiency achieved when you at coming to a stop. Hitting 100% is significantly easier in my experience with my test sample of 1 vehicle using the single pedal option, like everything though, I'm sure it's not the same across the board.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

The complaint isn't that regeneration is bad, because that's been part of any battery vehicle since the first Prius in 1997. The complaint is that while Toyota solved this problem before much of Lemmy's userbase was born, only Elon decided to make the car behave fucking weird.