These are starting to really stack up with the nutty mods in some of these places and I'd like to keep score and perhaps display them somewhere. I'm wondering if there's a list?

If not, short of crawling every community findable by an account and checking banned status by e.g. attempting to post, is there a way to collate such a list programmatically with e.g. an API or cURL or selenium automation, given the structure of the fediverse?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

No. I was helping people practice harm reduction if they do get amphetamine - be it Adderall or LisDex formulation like Vyvanse/Elvanse without the oversight of a medical professional or pharmacist and explaining that it is a possibility, and that instead of the war on drugs type approach of claiming it's simply not real, we should take care of our own with solidarity, e.g. explaining how to get proper purity tests to ensure you are not consuming meth, how to find reliable and semi-trustworthy sources, avoid scams etc.

Just comveying things I learned the hard way - from experience - while waiting on the NHS for a prescription that I have now and having to keep my life together to keep my job etc in the meanwhile.

I did the same for my own IRL gf who suffered from meds shortages, and I did the same for the trans community back in the day and I stand by it.

Edit: I genuinely cannot understand how this can be downvoted by anyone of sound mind whatsoever. Every single person I know with ADHD self-medicates or has self-medicated with darknet amph or supplemented during shortages due to healthcare system fuckups, but they are shit at it, getting god knows what miscallenous powders and suffering.

How could someone ever possibly disagree with promoting harm reduction practices, yet agree with a sensationalist comment that equates ADHD medication to meth? How can you actually think at all, and arrive at such a conclusion?

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The opinions on the morality of harm reduction are irrelevant. The ADHD community on Lemmy is not the appropriate place to spread that knowledge for a ton of reasons that have nothing to do with the morality of harm reduction.

I'm not surprised you got banned. You were putting the administration and moderation team in a very difficult position. You should have simply stated 'I have knowledge about X. Contact me on direct messages or Session/Signal/Matrix for details'

For the record I completely agree with your position on harm reduction

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If that's not the appropriate place to spread such information, then what is? If anything to me that's what such places should be about.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not your space to make that decision for. You are not the one who has potential problems if it draws negative attention. You aren't the one responsible if server admins choose to block that community due to the law-breaking information you're making available.

The appropriate place to share information that clearly instructed people on how to break the law is in private, or in a space you have created and control yourself.

It's uncool to demand others allow you to use spaces they are in charge of like this. Have a little respect for the people who actually created these spaces.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Idk, I think it's just kinda cringe honestly to be this overly-cautious on a relatively unknown forum no one cares about but fair enough, it's on the admins, it's their decision and their space, I won't respect them for that decision, though.

Fwiw to clarify, I did not link to DNMs and vendors and give instructions on the specifics of where and how to acquire illicit drugs, which is where for instance the issue becomes rule-breaking on places like /r/Drugs or /r/TransDIY, presumably to align with where it becomes legally troublesome, and used that as a baseline.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't agree with the determination either, and I definitely wouldn't run my own community that way

But I'm also a community admin elsewhere and have been doing that kind of stuff for like 25 years or something.

So I don't really begrudge any admin for deciding what things are off-limits for their community. It's up to me whether I participate there or not

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

Fair!

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

How can you actually think at all, and arrive at such a conclusion?

Bold claim, asserting that whoever downvoted you thought before doing it. Humans short-circuit all the time, nothing you can do about that, and getting bitter or exasperated won't help, either. Deal with it. If you want you can start your comments with something universally agreeable, that always helps, and only then get into details. "Universally agreeable" as in "agreeable to both truth and all false notions anyone on earth has at the moment". If you want to get idiots to listen you have to start out on a common ground that they share.

More specifically, in this case, you could've started your comment with a short rant about the state of availability of ADHD medication.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm not bitter, ultimately none of this affects me in the selfish sense, just lightly perplexed. I appreciate your explanation. Figures most people just have kneejerk reactions.