this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
67 points (88.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44171 readers
2148 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With copilot included in Professional-grade Office 365 and some politician claiming that their government should use AI to be more efficient. I am curious on whether some of you did use "AI" to get some productive things done. Or if it's still mostly a toy for you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I use GPT in the sense of "I need to solve X problem, are there established algorithms for this?" which usually gives me a good starting point for actual searching.

Most recent use-case was judging the similarity of two strings: I had never heard of "Levenschtein distance" before, but once I had that keyword it was easy to work from there.

Also: cmake and bash boilerplate

[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Describing a concept and getting the term is awesome with an LLM.

Iโ€™ve found documentation and discussions of various strategies Iโ€™m considering in tech work.

I describe my idea, the LLM gives me the existing term for that strategy, and then I can find discussion, guides, and theory about that. Keeps me from reinventing the wheel.

[โ€“] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It makes sense when you think about it too: It's a language model, so it should be expected to do a decent job as a glorified dictionary