this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
210 points (97.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8782 readers
358 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A non enforced requirement sounds like it is not a requirement.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see it more like that Microsoft are saying something like "Fine, you can install Windows 11 without meeting the official minimum requirenments, but we can't promise that future patches won't break your system.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I mean if I was a shitty corporation that wanted to onboard new clients I would do a sweet bait and switch later once they are dependant on the new system... And I don't just mean Microsoft, it is common now