this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
568 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wait, is Unity allowed to just change its fee structure like that? | Confusing, contradictory terms of service clauses leave potential opening for lawsuits.::Confusing, contradictory terms of service clauses leave potential opening for lawsuits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StarManta@lemmy.world 163 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have been a developer professionally and exclusively using Unity for 17 years. Yesterday, I installed Unreal Engine. I’m doing as many tutorials as I can this weekend.

I have no faith now that there will be enough studios willing to use Unity to sustain a career based on it.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Godot is in terrific shape should you not wish to give any of your revenue away. Of course I wouldn’t use Godot for a project that requires advanced rendering features or high graphical fidelity.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Godot is also free software; if they tried to do something like Unity then 3rd parties can remove the offending code and even continue development without the them. Unreal is only source available, you ultimately could have the same issue with Unreal in the future.

[–] dukk@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t mean to be pedantic, but I think you meant Godot is open source. Yeah, I agree.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Open source is the term the Godot website uses to refer to the engine. I'm using the term free software as I think about Unity being proprietary in terms of denying user freedom rather than weighing it up as a business decision.

[–] dukk@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, free as in freedom, not free as in cost. Gotcha.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Godot please

Nothing will stop Unreal pulling the same thing

[–] EnglishMobster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Unreal has explicit licensing terms that forbid them from doing this. Terms which people are going to pay very close attention to.

Not to mention that Epic gets their money from Fortnite, not necessarily the engine. They have no reason to squander their goodwill like that.

On top of that - if you want to release on a console, you need to write all the console-specific code yourself. This is quite a lot of work, especially for an indie developer.

Godot is a great start, but it's got a long way to go before it's a commercial-ready engine.