this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
13 points (54.5% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The article's title covers everything. Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

No it isn't.

EDIT:

OK to explaind on this just a bit. Slack is a Searchable Log of All Conversation and Knowledge. That's all it is. If all you do is talk shit on there, it's going to be a repository of shit talking and that's not slacks fault.

Personally, slack has saved me a countless amount of time at work. Having a technical problem? Search slack, someone probably asked about it and there's a solution for that. If there's no answer, asking in the right channel will usually get it answered pretty quickly.

Especially as a remote company, slack or a tool like it is pretty indispensable for working with my team. And yes, we talk a lot of shit on there and those conversations happen in shit talking channels which means they don't clutter the productive channels but I can still bond with my team a bit.

I guess like any tool, it's about how you use it. In this case though I don't think you can blame the tool even though slack is definitely not perfect. It's definitely far from Facebook, I honestly think you'd win some kind of record with that stretch.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Tell ‘em Aurenkin!

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago

If all you do is talk shit on there, it's going to be a repository of shit talking and that's not slacks fault.

perfect. yeah I love slack. people can post their FB shit in #random but the team chat is a great way to get and find answers.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've worked at companies where we had great communication policies around slack. Slack rooms were for the room topic, not for conversations.

There was an off topic room where people could be social and shit talk.

But basically due to our moderation rules, we really encourage people to keep channels on topic. Which made it more useful, less noisy. So it's a social network and so far is social people use it. But the structure on top of it is determined by the company policy and the culture

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're really stretching the meaning of "social network" there. May as well say the postal system is a social network.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago

its used by people socially, so yes, i think the post office counts as a social network... literally

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Newspapers had those things where you could chat by sending in mail and having a nickname and shit.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would never talk shit about anything at work on a medium that keeps a permanent record. Do people really have that hard a time staying professional?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course it's not wise to talk shit on a company platform, but Slack is hardcore about privacy.

I'm our Slack admin. I cannot see a DM I wasn't invited to. I cannot even see private channel names that I'm not invited to.

The only way Slack will divulge private posts, or posts in private channels, is if the account owner contacts support and makes a case for why they need to see anything private.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The danger in my mind isn’t someone without access, it’s someone with access taking screenshots and using them against you. That’s why I don’t say anything remotely shitty unless it’s on unrecorded audio.