this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
634 points (89.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

4546 readers
883 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think we can track down several times two state option was on the table, starting as early as 68

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Very cool and false. But now everyone accepts it except Israel.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What is the benefit from lying? I don't get it. This is all basic info.

The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.

It was also on the table at Camp David.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How does that prove they're lying about Israel currently not supporting it?

Right now they're wanting to just take the land after eliminating the people who lived there

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because I said it was on the table several times in the past. And they wrote:

Very cool and false

???

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes because they've (Israel) always negotiated in good faith. Even the camp David accords was a 2 state solution in name only

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, there you have it. The most unproductive statements as usual. If you don't know the specifics, why comment? Why not discuss the actual policies or the historical details? Why live in the realm of memes and buzzwords? Oh wait... I know why

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You really want to discuss the specifics and history of just the versions that make Israel look good?

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why, do the details make Israel look good? Is there a reason to shy away from having a meaningful discussion or is it better to hide behind memes and catchphrases

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They don't. And you're the one calling everything buzzwords, memes and catchphrases now.

Whats amazing is wanting to go into the history when that makes Israel look even worse. But you do you

Finally going through your comment history I see you're nothing but a constrain. There's nothing productive from further discussion. Have a great holiday

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Par for the course. Searching for specifics or facts of a matter is not being a contrarian. It's called doing due diligence without letting bias cloud your view. We all have narratives we wish to paint. But unfortunately reality is more complicated than yapping online about how Nazzi or not Israel is. That's the difference between online virtue signaling and someone who is interested in pursuing the truth.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notice none of that is an argument or denial of how shit Israel has been it's entire history.

Even bringing up nazis.

3/10 attempt

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Notice how you can only engage at a superficial level with the topic? My money is you can't even locate Israel on a map at this point. But thanks for having an opinion on the subject. I'm not surprised as this has been the most you can get talking anything related to geopolitics on this platform.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And now insults. 1/10.

Have an argument.

I'm not surprised as this has been the most you can get talking anything related to geopolitics on this platform.

It's impressive how much you type to say jack shit and make whatever you are arguing for worse.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's impressive how much of an opinion on a topic people can have despite not knowing jack shit. But for some reason the onus is always on the rest of us to hold your hand. And if we get into the specifics of something suddenly we're 'contrarian'.

Israel is committing genocide for sure but don't kid yourself in the narrative that hamas is some noble liberation army. It's clear you're not equipped to talk about any of this.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago

At what point have I expressed anything that puts hamas in a good light?

Again still just insulting.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ok now explain why Israel does not accept the deal since Hamas does accept it.

I do not have to read any history to disprove your lies. I can open the news right now.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are correct. Israel, in the present does not accept the two state solution. Hence why I was talking about the past.

  1. Why was it rejected by PLO when it was on the table?.

  2. Show me where Hamas is open to a two state solution.

  3. What is the meaning of "from the river to the sea"

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why was it turned down, Geneva? Care to elaborate?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because Israel is a Nazi esque apartheid.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Wow. What an insightful response. I stand by what I said earlier: You guys have no idea what you're talking about.