this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
343 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2712 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden's press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Both conservative parties voted for the anti-trans bill you keep defending. It can be both bipartisan and conservative. That's what bipartisan has implied for at least a decade.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its a really bad look to desperately try to remove as much context as possible.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a really bad look to throw vulnerable minorities under the bus.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the Republicans should stop doing that, 100%.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Democrats shouldn't have overwhelmingly voted with them. If this came down to all Republicans and a couple Manchins, that would be one thing. But it didn't.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Democrats didn't add this to the defence bill. Democrats are compromising now after fighting these changes for a year so that the next even more conservative congress, voted in by people like you, in a month doesn't sign something far far far far worse, with actual death tolls and war crimes as a result.

Go read some of the failed Republican Amendments to the 2024 NDAA.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats didn’t add this to the defence bill.

They didn't have to show overwhelming support for it, either. But since they agree with you that trans people are expendable, they did.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If those trans kids break a bone or get sick they get covered, so clearly I care more about them than you who wants them to get no coverage.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Know what happens when trans kids don't get the treatment that you and both parties don't want them to have? Know what happens when they can't get access to puberty blockers? Know what happens when their skeletons begin to ossify into a form abhorrent to them?

Some of them commit suicide.

I'd say you don't care, but I have no doubt whatsoever that dead trans kids are your preferred outcome.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Democrats want them to have that treatment, but you and one party would rather shutdown an entire sector of the government than give it to them, taking away their general medical coverage as well.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Democrats want them to have that treatment

They just voted to deny it.