this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
694 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
6263 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

A quote in the article suggests it should be the app stores verifying which is even more fucking stupid.

Why?

[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because the internet isn't an app store

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 16 points 20 hours ago

The quote says that app stores should be responsible for verifying age, but social media is not limited to apps - they're just one of multiple user interfaces for interacting with social networks. So that alone cannot solve the problem.

Sorry for the confusion

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 6 points 18 hours ago

Because how would you do that on desktop? Or on a degoogled phone? Or if the download was via an apk from elsewhere?

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because the app store isn't the only way to install an app. It is trivially easy to side load apps and it's well within the technologic skillset of the average 12 year old.

They can also just use a web browser.