this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
942 points (99.6% liked)

Fediverse

28947 readers
2062 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

If all the things in the work queue, you're balking on a COLOUR SCHEME?

That's like stopping the construction crew for using the wrong colour work boots, man!

[–] rami@ani.social 31 points 1 day ago

light mode gives me migraines dude. it's more important than just a color preference.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No dark mode, no use.

BTW, work boot color is absolutely regulated depending on context. For example here in Germany, if you work in sterile or food-related industries then shoes are to be issued and used with a color that cannot inherently hide stains by the material you're working with, to prevent accidentally carrying contaminations into other clean zones.

So yes, you would stop the construction crew for using the wrong color work boots.

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Same for medical software. Green MUST be an approved green color, and same for red, as the wrong color can give wrong advice and may kill people.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

you’re balking on a COLOUR SCHEME

How can I not?? Dx

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It's more like stopping the construction crew from painting your house a colour you hate. Which sounds more reasonable

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No it isn't, if a modern app doesn't have dark-mode to protect your eyes Then it's a health-hazard

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look, someone reported this as misinformation. Too bad me, the active mod here, gets pain in the eyes, sometimes flickering vision, and sometimes what I would describe as sea sickness from staring onto bright white screens. When I have no other choice because work, I invert all screen colors but sometimes correct colors are important.

So yeah, no proper dark mode means it's a crap app.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's common knowledge that dark-mode hurts your eyes less So yeah, these people who reported are people who think their opinions & google-searches are superior to common knowledge

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are other vision conditions where people cannot see letters in dark mode that well. Apps and websites should just follow whatever the OS setting is, no matter the motivation of the user. Even if it's just a matter of taste and not some form of eye sight condition, it's just as valid.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Agreed, but all apps (especially social media ones) need a dark-mode

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Cuz you said so, why don't you stare into a bright light & find out

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Hold on, are you confusing something being hurting (as in, causing pain and/or pathological damage) with something being exhausting (as in, strains your eyes) with something being annoying?

Because if the three words are used interchangeably in your vocabulary that'd explain a lot of your seemingly random posts in the comments here. They're not the same (at all) to most people and especially not on a medical level (like that article you yourself provided, there is no medical evidence for non-extreme light sources making a difference in eye health).

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thats nonsense

Literally spent 30 seconds on a Google before you start spewing lies like this.

There's a variety of reasons to prefer dark mode, but spreading fake health information isn't valid.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I spent reading books, before YOU started smearing a well-know fact as a lie It's connected with causing myopia & eye-strains

Your precious google won't tell you that (Or maybe you simply clicked the first link that confirmed your bias)

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine, let's play. Wheres the study you are using as your source?

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Pick up an opthalmology book, find it yourself & ask your opthalmology specialist Those are my sources & here's a website too (do you have the guts to touch grass ?)

I already mentioned it, it's the same reason why we use blue-light filters & why we use anti-glare screen protectors

But apparently a single "google-search" is enough for you

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You really should read pages you want to link. And I say this as a die-hard dark mode user. It's worrying that you so aggressively attack people get cannot even read the page you link far enough to notice that what you are saying about it is nonsense (like how it has "the same reason", which of course it doesn't, as made clear in the article).

Or you know, at least don't be such a dick. That's also help a lot!

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

People who say light-mode is not a hazard are the real dicks

Darker (& warmer) colours do not strain your eyes, why are we debating on this ?? This is well-known

You think I did not read the article ? There are more articles that I can link, but will you read it ? (Also try using your intelligence & realize why I said "same reason") This is one of the most laymen one I could find. Again it doesn't really disprove my other point of light-mode being harmful.