this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
357 points (98.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35897 readers
748 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than "mildly infuriating", this is deeply depressing.

(And seeing TikTok two times there don't make things better...)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

at least its proton vpn instead of the scammy ones.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Apparently the CEO of proton is a big trumper now :(

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

You read one title and one tweet and assume a guys whole identity. WTF. Also Proton is owned by it's employees and a non-profit. https://proton.me/about/team There are many other people there. Also the tweet was a picture. Also if it is real it's not that bad to compliment a president on choosing a guy that actually is listening about what you have to say against big tech.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also if it is real it’s not that bad to compliment a president on choosing a guy that actually is listening about what you have to say against big tech.

I'm hoping Yen just fucked up and posted without thinking it through, but seriously, I can't in any way take anyone seriously who says Trump is sticking it to big tech and fighting for the little guy when we literally know the going rate for a big tech bribe to Trump. It's a million dollars from the CEO personally, donated to the inauguration fund. Zuck, Cook and others have each done it, and gained audiences with Trump.

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am not an American and maybe do not understand how the political system operates. However I did not write that Trump is sticking it to the big guys. You are making something up there. If Trump chose a minister is not the minister responsible for listening to the industry? Yen's and Proton's position (taking this from the now removed Mastodon post) was/is that the Democrats chose Kamala instead of Bernie and Kamala's team did not listen. Trumps apointee did listen. If it were Bernie's team I am sure Proton would complement Bernie for choosing someone who listens. I just do not think this is a big deal.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That was referring to Yen's statement actually, not what you said.

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Then why did you quote me 😵‍💫

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Your ability to interact with people on a text forum is very questionable.

He quoted you to disagree with you on your overall point, then went to specifics.

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I did assume that he’s extremely stupid if he thinks anything good could ever come from Trump. It’s not like he’s some mysterious unknown quantity at this point, we’ve been through this before. Also what happened to italics1?

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’m not a “Trumper,” but the amount of preemptive conclusions and quick judgments people make, especially those who claim to be tolerant and empathetic, is quite hypocritical.

I don’t deny that I sometimes jump to conclusions too, but I’m amazed at how people don’t even bother to research for even a few seconds! They see a picture, realize it’s not a person destroying something Trump tweeted, notice other comments that jump to conclusions, and that’s all it takes for them to make their own conclusions.

If those in charge’s goal is to divide us and stifle critical thinking, they’ve been remarkably successful. It’s a shame because humans could achieve so many incredible things if we weren’t constantly divided and consumed by hatred.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The tweet said "this guy who is fucking Elon musk for money now is the only one supporting the little guys". It doesn't take a lot to think through this, it doesn't take empathy. We are fighting an irrational cult of personality bent on destroying the united States as we know it, and for the worse. Supporting Trump at all is not an option.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Careful who you trust, proton is trump scum

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

Just found out today. this is why we cant have nice things.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 20 hours ago

What did they do?

[–] italics2@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You fell for a sensationalising post.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] italics2@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you mean that Proton is a scum you are writing something that is false. Proton is doing many things that are usefull and right. Should I elaborate?

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I didn't write anything, I just asked if the message about proton's head supporting Trump was false.

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe you should have worded the question like that from the beginning. It is hard to tell what you mean otherwise.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, you just didnt read. The sequence was

  • Someone else says proton is pro trump
  • You say they fell for a sensationalizing post
  • I asked but is it wrong, though

This isn't confusing or ambiguous.

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

I did read. In the second response I did try to declare my assumption on what I thought that you ment. I did not mean that you have written it but rather that if you were to write that it would be false. I should have worded it like that: "If you mean is Proton a scum you would be wrong." I wrote about "scum" not "trump scum" which I see now, to you, the latter means someone supporting Trump. Next time I will just ask what do you mean. I am new to these kind of sites and have rarely if ever posted so please excuse my mistake.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I am in a different time zone. It was 3am.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] italics2@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Should I still be using Surfshark? I only use it because it’s fast.