this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
60 points (92.9% liked)

Work Reform

9966 readers
18 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you think potential candidates should be reimbursed in some form for taking assessments that are required by the employer in order to be considered for employment?

Also, should this be available for only job candidates who are not considered for the position?

Or should it go for every job candidate, even the ones that get the position?

Thanks for reading and being your most precious and sensual self ❤️.

@workreform@lemmy.world
#workreform@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solivine@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I think they shouldn't be there in the first place - what is education for? Why are we doing assessments at the education level if they aren't actually valued or indicative of job performance?

[–] canni@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Not everyone is 20 years old. This absolutely doesn't make sense if you're hiring a 50 year old person who has been working for 30 years; their college grades are completely irrelevant at that point.

[–] solivine@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but if someone has been working for 30 years consistently do you really still need to assess them? Does an interview not suffice?

[–] canni@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on the role I think. Also, this is very relevant for people who have been working for just 5 years. 5 years in a job you can learn just as much practical knowledge as 5 years in college... or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)