this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
43 points (85.2% liked)

Technology

60806 readers
5048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cory Doctorow details the path to the enshitifications of Facebook and Twitter.

"This is what changed: the collapse of market, government, and labor constraints, and IP law's criminalization of disenshittifying, interoperable add-ons. This is why Zuck, an eternal creep, is now letting his creep flag fly so proudly today. Not because he's a worse person, but because he understands that he can hurt his users and workers to benefit his shareholders without facing any consequences. Zuckerberg 2025 isn't the most evil Zuck, he's the most unconstrained Zuck."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

who are legally obligated to increase profits or risk litigation by shareholders

Sort of. There is no law that requires corporations to maximize short-term returns to shareholders. It entirely depends on the corporate charter. There are corporate charters that include wording that quarterly profit optimization is not a goal. C-levels repeating the "fiduciary duty" mantra are generally blowing smoke, since their corporate charters can (usually) be amended with approval of a majority of shareholders. In other words, it's the way it is because they set it up that way.