this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
108 points (95.8% liked)

Canada

9464 readers
1636 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I wanted electoral reform but I think going for it would have been a mess.

No two major parties agreed on what should replace FPTP.

If the liberals had used a majority to unilaterally rewrite our elections that sets a bad precedent (Not that precedent seems to matter much these days).

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

He had a majority, didn't need any input from other parties. He didn't want to do it because he knew it would stop him from getting a majority at the next election. It's that simple.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

fascists worldwide have already set that precedent.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

The irony is, the FPTP system is now likely going to hammer the Liberals into oblivion. Funny how that ol' irony works.