this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
428 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
156 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DocBlaze@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The government, however, has said the bill does not ban end-to-end encryption.

Instead it will require companies to take action to stop child abuse on their platforms and as a last resort develop technology to scan encrypted messages, it has said.

Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible.

Jesus Christ how staggeringly incompetent is the national government that no tech ceo can find a way to explain to them there is no way to govern content without having access to it via a known backdoor, which very plainly is to fundamentally break encryption.

Let's propose a bill that forces them to find a way to invent a flashable laser beam that scans for government corruption that happens behind closed doors, even private residences, and if they miss anything, the entire cabinet will be fined and must legally be fired before next election.

You see the bill doesn't make you responsible for all corruption in every back alley everywhere, only for not immediately detecting and stopping it before it takes hold, in any shape or form not currently possible.

Fucking morons. Don't we decide who is smart enough to be voted into government? These people are the best we can come up with? This what I think people mean when they say voting is pointless.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the idea behind these kinds of laws isn't so much the stated intent, which as far as I can tell is basically unenforceable, but to introduce a ton of extremely vague laws that could apply to almost anything you do online, which they can then use selectively against whoever they feel like.

[–] chillhelm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. And that's worse.

load more comments (5 replies)