this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
486 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
4025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
486
Meredith Whittaker reaffirms that Signal would leave UK if forced by privacy bill (techcrunch.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meredith Whittaker reaffirms that Signal would leave UK if forced by privacy bill::Meredith Whittaker, the president of the Signal Foundation, the organization that maintains the Signal messaging app, spoke about the U.K.'s controversial new privacy bill at TC Disrupt 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are the governments around the world afraid of? Always so quick to go for overly invasive privacy laws. They should be afraid of the citizens, not the other war around.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are afraid of the citizens, that's why they want to be able to read all the messages.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I think they're saying that they are supposed to be (i.e., this doesn't need fixing). If they "fix" it, the people will be afraid of the government.