this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
710 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

61850 readers
3097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

As a socialist I believe intellectual property is a falsehood and technological advancement should be for the public good. Open source LLMs are for the public good.

Given the options between having open source LLMs and the US Govt banning non-corpo non-proprietary LLMs and giving a free pass to people like Musk and Altman and Zucc to monopolize, I happily pick the former.

You're delusional if you think they will pay anyone, the only way zucc will pay is with a guillotine.

Corpos will make inter-platform deals that'll simply make all online data licensable for the right price and enrich each other so you can't avoid it while still actually being a career creative, but price out academic researchers and the public sector so that all fruits of it stay behind closed R&D doors and be free of ethics etc.

Continuing in your role as a useful idiot, you'll also most likely also foot the bill for it via subsidies from your taxes to "develop the AI sector" in some anti-China dick measuring contest by the US.

You will then be sold this data back via proprietary chat bots via a monthly subscription and you better pay up because once it gets really good, it will become mandatory to use for just about any job, leaving you with no choice.

Or you can support FOSS LLMs.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I support FOSS LLMs, but which actually exist? Which LLMs have open-sourced all their training data?

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Mistral? Deepseek?

Not LLM but also SD which uses a very popular free dataset.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Can I freely download all the training data for any of those? I was under the impression they were all trained on non-licensed and copyrighted data.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You’re confusing self entitlement to stuff with the left.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Lolwut? Public good is self-entitlement? Go read a fucking book. Communists are not pro-copyright, especially not when it only benefits the giant corpos.

Another day, another entitled artoid larping as progressive blocked.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 23 hours ago

That must have touched a sensitive spot lol.

Lieber Genosse, der Hype um Affirming Incompetence (AI) ist der dieser Zeit die höchste Ausdruck der Entfremdung der Menschen von sich selbst, Zeugnis des Begehrens nach und Voraussetzung also der weitergehenden Fetischisierung seines Zugriffs auf Welt. Wie jedoch Bernard Stiegler so schön bemerkte: Kein Savoir-vivre ohne Savoir-faire! Dies seien die unabdingbaren Bedingungen für die Befreiung der Menschheit aus den sich selbst angelegten Ketten zur Errichtung einer geschwisterlichen Ordnung!

(now have fun w/ an LLM's attempt of "advancement"!)