this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
447 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19865 readers
3815 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

We have similar things for jesus such as the writings of people who recorded the existence of people who followed a guy named Jesus a few decades after his death.

Yes, we have contempory, verified sources of Aristotle's lectures, and writings.

We have no such thing for Yeshua. The earliest is, as you say, "a few decades", aka 70 years. That's two entire generations. Nothing contemporary, and in fact, contemporary documents actually contradict much of what was written.

It would ge really odd for people around the Mediterranean to all follow the teachings of a guy who they call by the same name who never existed.

And yet, here were are, writing about a mystical man in the sky... Who never existed, as far as any evidence tells us. And, in fact, whatever evidence we DO find, contradicts the claims made by adherents to that mythology.

Hell, how many Romans wrote about how awesome on the field of battle Hercules was... Pretty certain a demigod never existed by the name of Hercules.

BTW, from your link:

"There is no physical or archaeological evidence tied to Jesus, nor do we have any written evidence directly linked to him"

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We have things that other people who may or may not have known Aristotle claim Aristotle wrote. If you believe Aristotle and Plato were real people then you should accept that Jesus was based on somebody even if the message he was spreading isn’t the same as the faith maintains now.

Why not try reading the link rather than expounding upon a false understanding? For example the earliest writings are from around 70CE which is 37-40 years later. You shoildn’t be making any claims when you are making mistakes this simple because you clearly aren’t coming from an educated perspective.

I’m not saying Jesus Christ in the Bible is a historical figure. I am saying there was a real human being that was a basis for the faith.

And again all of this is based on what actual academic historians maintain not religious figures. What is your take based upon other than conjecture?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We have things that other people who may or may not have known Aristotle claim Aristotle wrote.

We have many things, written right about the same time, all making the same claims, about what Artistotle wrote.

We do not have congruent, contemporary writings about Jesus/Yeshua.

Why not try reading the link rather than expounding upon a false understanding?

I did. And there is not evidence of his existence, as your link stated. Does that mean Yeshua, the individual, did not exist? No. But, it's also not on us to prove he did not exist! That's impossible (Proving a negative).

What we can say: There is no evidence he existed, even in places it should exist. And, exceptional claims (Such as a virgin birth, son of god, major political decisions) require exceptional evidence.

You cannot prove there isn't a teapot orbiting the sun, either. However, we can safely assume there is not, until such evidence has been found to support said claim.

For example the earliest writings are from around 70CE which is 37-40 years later.

Fine. The closest writings are from 40 years late. One full generation. Did the prior generation not think to write ANYTHING about this guy? Not even a Roman notice somewhere? A proclamation of all male children being executed? NOTHING. Until 40 years after the claimed event.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Where do you think this evidence should exist? Do you think the Jews and Romans kept birth records for the equivalent of working class people?

Again Im not claiming there was a messiah. Im not claiming miracles were real so put own that straw bale you keep returning to.

Ok and how do you think thousands of people all separated by massive distances all arrive on the same name and basic stories if they weren’t based on a single guy?

Why would you think Rome has records of random people? We cannot prove the existence of almost anyone from Rome that way other than the extremely wealthy and influential.

Do you have any actual historical education beyond secondary school? You don’t seem to

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think the Jews and Romans kept birth records for the equivalent of working class people?

Yes

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

why and on what? Remember papyrus and vellum were expensive and paper was invented in China in 105CE. The state wasn’t expending money on this.

There was no record of these births/deaths for most people until relatively recently in many countries.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

Where do you think this evidence should exist?

Well, to start... Contemporary accounts.

Do you think the Jews and Romans kept birth records for the equivalent of working class people?

Its literally claimed that Yeshua was subject to a census, performed by Romans, who were meticulous in their record keeping. We have no record of a census, period.

Or, even decrees by Pilate ordering his execution.

Or even, just, news of some radical with his name, causing trouble. NOTHING.

What we have are accounts from 40-100 years later, making bold claims. Much like we have similar sets of evidence for the existence of a man named Hercules who was a demigod as well.

Again Im not claiming there was a messiah. Im not claiming miracles were real so put own that straw bale you keep returning to.

You are, however, expecting us to believe something with no evidence.

Ok and how do you think thousands of people all separated by massive distances all arrive on the same name and basic stories if they weren’t based on a single guy?

Same way all mythology forms. Tall tales told, and retold.

Why would you think Rome has records of random people?

This isn't "random people"... This is a person, who was so hated by his own community,they demanded a Roman governor try, and execute him. And Roman's kept pretty detailed records about this sort of stuff.

SOMETHING would have survived. Nothing survived, or more likely, never existed.

Do you have any actual historical education beyond secondary school? You don’t seem to

Yes, I actually do, thanks. And none of the mythology should be taken any more serious than any other mythology we study.