this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
19 points (85.2% liked)

Privacy

31872 readers
524 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
ranok@sopuli.xyz
19
Can we start a group in wire? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I use wire (wire. com) for daily chatting. I like it but I couldn't find any good communities in wire. In session, or simpleX, there are privacy (and other) groups in which anyone can participate.. Can we start a privacy group in wire so we folks can also hang around?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sxan@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't invest time in Wire.

I got my entire family to use it seven or eight years ago. Since then, Wire has continually made changes that have only made the system worse for free users. I assume they're doing it to push people to the paid subscriptions, but it could also simply be developer incompetence. Either way, there isn't a good alternative for a non-techie group of people, amd switching costs are high, so we're stuck on it as it slowly degrades.

Notifications have become consistently more flakey over time, and none of our Android users can "Share" media with the app anymore (it doesn't show up as an option). Wire used to have an animated GIF lookup option built-in - sort of like fancy emojis - which disappeared earlier this year. Group video calls were disabled for the free tier last year. It's a slow enshitification, and I'd recommend not investing time onboarding a bunch of people.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there isn't a good alternative for a non-techie group of people

I find Signal to be very user friendly, what don't you like about it?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Metadata. Requiring a phone number to register. And a hostile anti-federation, anti-API stance by Signal. Sure, you can run your own server, but you can't connect to anyone in the official Signal network, and third-party apps are also disallowed.

Wire has the same problem, don't get me wrong. They've been resolutely refusing any third-party connections (mainly requests from Matrix bridge folks). But Signal isn't an improvement on these fonts.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Signal is building straight alternative to WhatsApp. And it is very good because everyone who uses it can easily switch to Signal, without complications. Federation adds many new concepts (problems) for normal human, more latency and makes development way slower which is also very bad for mass adoption. And they are against only of 3rd party clients which use Signal in name. Molly exists, f.e. So Signal rocks 🤟😄

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 1 year ago

Well, you said it yourself, Wire isn't much different in that regard, so Signal is pretty much a one for one substitute.
I would like federation for Signal too somehow, in fact I use Matrix on the side, in particular with people I don't want to share my phone number with, but that doesn't prevent it from being a very solid option in and of itself

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any alternatives?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Update 2023-09-28

Edits include addl feature discussion, but mainly an update on Session.

~Nope.~ Maybe?

  • Session looks very promising, and I'm trying it right now with my wife. She's much better at catching software warts - if she starts using it more than the N other ways (she currently has Jami, Element, SMS, and now Session on her phone), then I'll know it's a hit. It is lacking a critical feature for phone use: editing previous messages, and it'd be nice if it had Jami's location-sharing. Security and anonymity looks good.
  • Matrix is promising, but encryption is still extremely brittle, and prevents me from inviting non-technical F&F.
  • SimpleX is promising, but without multi-device support, it's a non-starter.
  • Jami is promising, but I can't get the client to work on Arch (it just segfaults), and the answer to my ticket was "Arch isn't supported." In my case, it's because my Qt was newer than their required version - it compiled, but just segfaulted. I lost interest at that point. Notifications are unreliable, as is message delivery. It fails the wife test. It does have a great realtime location sharing feature, which is super handy for, e.g., picking people up at the airport, but that's not enough of a killer feature top overcome the reliability issues.
  • Tox - Shoot. I try Tox every once in a while. I know that I uninstalled it once because the mobile app sucked my battery down, but I don't remember if it has some fundamental flaw. I think it doesn't support multi-device? I'll have to check it again.
  • Lichat looked interesting, but Ocelot hasn't been updated since '21; it's a small project with not a lot of documentation beyond the spec

~I may have looked at Session at one point, but don't remember why I put it in the No category. I'll have to review it again.~ See my update at top. Session is currently a contender.

XMPP may be the elephant in the room. I used XMPP for years, back before Google supported it, and after. I know a lot of people advocate it, and I think it's a reasonable option; it's certainly well-established. It leaks a lot of metadata, but then, it wasn't designed with security in mind - all of the security has been bolted on after the fact, frankenstein mode. So has multi-participant chat. In fact, most features have been tacked on, and I guess that's why I avoid it these days. Nothing seems well-integrated and reliably functioning. But YMMV; it may be the best option at the moment.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

It leaks a lot of metadata

That is largely a myth. Sure metadata protection could be better in XMPP, but it is not worse than in most other chat systems, and certainly much better than in Matrix for example.