this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)

Canada

10122 readers
689 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

'We trusted you'

No you didn't. Trust is a partnership. One that recognizes that humans are fallible and sees people work together to look out for each other for the betterment of the group.

Trust would have seen someone also take a look at the person and, upon realizing his background, point out "This person is not who you think he is." and the speaker realizing "Oh shit, you're right. We had better cancel these ceremonies."

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who are you asserting had prior knowledge of this and said nothing?

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I appreciate the trust that has formed here – with you calling attention to something that may have been miscommunicated. Can you point to where you got the idea that someone did have prior knowledge so that I can correct it? There was no such intent.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trust would have seen someone point out “This person is not who you think he is.” and the speaker realizing “Oh shit, you’re right. We had better cancel these ceremonies.”

My interpretation of this is that someone would have had to know that this person is not who he thought he was, and given him the heads-up.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

With trust, parties look out for each other for the betterment of the group. Just like you have done here – having recognized that something wasn't quite right and brought it to my attention. (And on that note I have attempted to make that statement more clear on your recommendation. I do hope I have succeeded this time.)

I assume absolutely nobody took the time to look at the honouree. Most likely because nobody actually gives a rat's ass about his background. If there was trust, it could have been broken if the group pointed out that this person is not worthy of being honoured and the speaker went ahead with it anyway, but to do nothing and then throw him under the bus because nobody cared means there was no trust to begin with.