this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
201 points (99.0% liked)

politics

20577 readers
6035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Social Security Administration, now under the control of an official installed by U.S. President Donald Trump, began the process of gutting whole segments of the agency and firing a huge portion of its already diminished workforce, sparking alarm among advocates who say the move will almost certainly result in benefit delays and disruptions.

The American Prospect, which first reported earlier this week that Acting SSA Commissioner Leland Dudek was weighing staff cuts of up to 50%, obtained an email sent late Thursday indicating that the department has launched an "agency-wide organizational restructuring that will include significant workforce reductions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (8 children)

This is what I mean by my constant insistence upon "moderation" in government. Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H.L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.
-- President Eisenhower

It seems that this is going to be put to the test.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Their number has grown but they are still stupid.

Not because they can't get away with it. They can, for a while anyway, before the economic chickens come home to roost.

They simply buy into the Ayn Rand notion that the richest actually do all the work... Which is simply not true and you'd have to be stupid to believe.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not because they can’t get away with it. They can, for a while anyway, before the economic chickens come home to roost.

With most conservatives they don't notice/disapprove of any of these kind of actions until they personally are affected.

I'm thinking through how this will manifest with Social Security. Certainly retirees receiving Social Security will notice first which represents a high percentage of traditional conservative votes. Second will be the adult children (in their 40s and 50s) that learn their living retired parents are affected. Except by then the damage will be done with months or years before the situation will return to where it was prior to trump.

So aging parents are going to be dependent on their adult children's goodwill in funding their retirement. For many adult children in this case they're already economically stressed and don't have the funds to support their aging parents too because they might still be economically supporting their young adult children struggling to find meaningful wage employment in today's job market. We'll see the aging parents tap any equity they have in their real estate to cover their short term expenses. Eventually those reverse mortgages will dry up too and possibly within 5 to 10 years.

Its going to be horrible for everyone except giant investment groups able to buy up the aging parent's homes on the cheap.

[–] Xenobiotic@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You forgot all of the disabled people on SSI. That's all ages.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's about 15 million on SSI or SSDI combined. 70 million receive SS retirement.

Lotta people...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)