partial_accumen

Your meme contains text. One of those words in that text is misspelled.

It would be hard to do? How much would that affect the general use of starlink for users on other parts of the world?

Only two countries have demonstrated air launched rockets that can destroy satellites on orbit, the USA and Russia. There is good speculation that China has built anti-satellites satellites, but no one is aware of any actual proven test.

Here's the USA's anti-satellite rocket being launched on its one and only test:

Now, lets assume that all 3 countries decide they want to attack Starlink satellites at once with all their weapons. Perhaps they destroy 30 satellites in total. As of November 2025 the Starlink network surpassed 10,000 satellites in orbit. As for replacing the lost satellites, a single launch places 25 to 28 satellites in orbit at a time. Within the next 24 hours 25 more Starlink satellites will be launched:

In 4 days, another launch is occurring that will place 24 more Starlink satellites in orbit.

source

So destroying a few dozen Starlink satellites might cause a slight blip in coverage for maybe a few minutes tops in specific narrow geographic locations, but only for a little while until replacements move to positions.

Your meme has a misspelling.

The SA (Brownshirts) were the generic rabble with no training or professional education as soldiers. Hitler invited them off the street and gave them a fancy uniform and a mandate to harass and kill those he didn't like. Doesn't that sound a lot like ICE today that will hire anyone with a pulse and a white supremacist attitude?

The SA were replaced in a power by the SS, the professional soldiers, in an uprising initiated by Hitler that murdered the SA leadership.

The parallels with the SS are striking

The SA, but yes.

Yep, this is what I do too and what I as pointing out. The carrier locked phones are even cheaper used than carrier unlocked.

You’ll usually end up paying more in the long run then if you went with unlocked and a MVNO.

You're missing a component: you can buy used phones and go with an MVNO and skip the contract subsidy requirement for savings

I purchased a used carrier locked flagship phone for $250 when they were still selling for $1100 as new carrier-unlocked, then put it on my MVNO which is a subsidiary of the primary carrier (so the carrier lock doesn't matter).

You can't get those cost savings with a new contract phone nor a new carrier unlocked phone.

Make sure it’s carrier unlocked, but yeah.

I'm all for buying my own phones and not getting one bundled with service. However, many times getting a carrier unlocked phone carries a price premium. As long as you're fine sticking with your current carrier, they can even be carrier locked and work just fine. I agree though, ownership of your phone outside of your carrier's billing is the right way to go.

(this may not apply to burning music, I usually burn PSX games)

The original 23 wire modchip installation was not for the faint of heart.

I didn't say it was on mpr. I gave full transparency it was my setup, and not the source site. I fully agree its my adblock. From the second post I've made in this thread, I've said the same thing and explained why I gave a confirming source. What I have works for me.

how is that not communicated?

Here is the bottom of the page I see:

My guess is that the copyright notice you're seeing is via a javascript function. As I said in my post:

"Nowhere on the adblocked/scriptblocked article page or front page of that site communicates its Minnesota Public Radio."

I took the extra step of verifying the same story from other sources, and added a link here to increase your original article's credibility for the important story you posted about the ICE home invasion. I don't want others reading your post and questioning if this home invasion by ICE is actually happening.

Its Minnesota Public Radio

Nowhere on the adblocked/scriptblocked article page or front page of that site communicates its Minnesota Public Radio. Maybe it would show that with adblock or script block turned off, but visibly questionable sites are the exact ones that should not have those protections turned off.

running an Associated Press report.

Just because a site claims an AP report doesn't mean it is. There's a lemmy poster that created a "satire" community that generates fake stories. The lemmy poster that creates these fake stories also claimed to be posting AP News articles. When challenged, they went back and edited the fake stories to also include fake (but reasonably sounding) news organizations.