this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
236 points (99.2% liked)

Games

17683 readers
814 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
236
Pokémon games have become consistently ugly, and it's alright to wish they weren't (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 1 day ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 28 points 20 hours ago

Part of the problem is a lot of pokemon weren't designed to live in a world, just be a sprite on a battle screen. It also got more egregious in later titles, but there's always been some problematic pokemon. So not only do you have to make a ton of models, you have to fudge the scales a lot to make Pidgey vs Onix look remotely good. There's really no way to make a decent looking game without drastically reducing the scope like pokemon snap did.