this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
1032 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

8199 readers
2920 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CheeseAndCatsup@lemmy.ca 54 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

It will be a shit show until Canada and the rest of the western world work out agreements independent of the US.

[–] gilogr@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They should call it "The Free World Agreement".

[–] Tja@programming.dev 20 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Over here in the EU we still need gas and oil. I'd much rather import it from Canada than from Qatar or some other middle eastern dictatorship.

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 2 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago) (1 children)

As a Canadian I agree but that is difficult. Canada is so integrated with the US that they basically refine all of our crude. Canadian crude is unlike crude from anywhere else and has to be refined a certain way. So we have to build refineries or you do, that can handle our capacity. That takes time and certainly won't be instantaneous. It's not like we can just divert.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 14 minutes ago

Yeah plus the transport would be much more expensive. But I guess building your own refineries will give much more flexibility for the future...

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

We're already doing that. EVERYBODY is doing that. every western nation is doing their best to cut America out of their trading deals. Donnie has seriously fucked America over.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 hours ago

that's sure to bring down the price of eggs, right? right?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 23 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Isolating a fascist power with the strongest military in the world doesn't work. Eventually they work up the balls to use it.

Every nation should be prepared for what happens when the purge of the US military and government is complete and only loyalists hold power.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Given that there are no ideal moves in any direction, I feel that standing up to the bully is the only option on the table. They failed to do that in 1939.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

And another thing. Its America's job to police this mess, they installed him either directly or indirectly. The rest of the world didn't ask or vote for this dangerous toddler.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 9 points 13 hours ago

It is still the right thing to do. As you say, we just all need to be prepared for it.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

What happens if a NATO country Attack another NATO country?

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No joke, I can see UK and France offering nuclear retaliation response promise to Canada, outside of NATO. I think trump really is dumb enough to start real war with for example Canada. NATO is dead, rest of the west needs to make similar protection agreements without USA, besides NATO , for when shit really hits the fan (I think it will, it's a matter of when, not if).

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, article 5 doesn't apply then. Other agreements may still apply.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Of course it applies! Where are you getting that it doesn't from?

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

From article 5 from the NATO treaty actually. It states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members.

Edit: the article or nato treaty doesn't state it that explicitly actually. But a quick google show that it's at least the consensus interpretation

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

it states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members

Which America would be if they leave NATO...