this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
89 points (90.8% liked)

[Closed] Moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

1584 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

Original sidebar infoTo discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Megathreads:

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] popcar2@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Oh hey, it's been a while since I've written this. Thanks for sharing it again. When I posted it last year to the fediverse community, people were not ready for it.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Excellent write-up of the problem and its potential solutions!

Do you know if Proposal 3 has made it to the Lemmy devs? If so, what was their response to it?

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I haven't checked since making this post but when the idea was floating around the devs said they preferred multi-communities (proposal 2). That's still on the Lemmy roadmap but isn't here yet.

That said, Piefed apparently implemented something similar to proposal 3 so maybe the devs can change their mind and copy them instead.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Piefed apparently implemented something similar to proposal 3

Have they? Blaze linked to a thread on the implementation of Piefed "feeds", which is a form of Proposal 2 (multi-communities). Have they also implemented Proposal 3 (communities following each other) as well?

I really hope the devs consider Proposal 3, as it seems like the solution which best fixes fragmentation.

load more comments (2 replies)