this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
623 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10849 readers
847 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] suzune@ani.social 3 points 10 months ago (10 children)

I'm against banning things. It's better to teach users how not to use these platforms.

It's more effective, because it has a long term effect.

I like the Danish idea to label EU products in supermarkets. Information is a good first step.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am in favor of banning X because it's run by someone who has threatened our sovereignty and, to be honest, a lot of people are pretty fucking dumb.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about TikTok, Facebook or Reddit? One is operated by an adversarial government, one harbors and aids scammers to steal millions, and Reddit is 4chan light.

Banning platforms is not the answer, it opens the door to banning as an easy solution to any issue.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't advocate for banning any of those platforms (though I think Meta should be broken up due to being a monopoly) because they're not literal mouthpieces for one dude. X is essentially now Elon's blog and he has illegally interfered with the US election and is trying the same with other countries.

I guess, as an alternative to banning X, I'd settle for it being forced to be sold to someone else or just Elon Musk leaving the picture entirely.

He is the problem. He has too much influence and power.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He is a problem but people who vote based on what they read on Twitter were already going to be a wasted vote. Education at an early age on how to think critically, ask questions and find answers is how you mitigate this kind of crap.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So these people who education has already failed... is it helpful and healthy to expose them to the raw bullshit of a staunchly eugenicist nazi? Should we buy them all copies of mein kampf because it couldn't do any more harm?

I agree that the right long term solution education...

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

maybe instead, pass a law. one with substantial penalties for failure to comply, that requires 'social media companies' of a 'certain size' to do (reasonable) 'things' in order to operate or make themselves available in canada. things that spaceman fireball would never do

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

He's the richest man in the world. You couldn't set a fine he wouldn't just pay as the cost of doing business.

[–] meliante@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

That idea is beautiful in theory, but useless in practice.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm against banning things. It's better to teach users how not to use these platforms.

Just because there's deeper root causes, doesn't mean the end result shouldn't be banned if its immoral or destructive. In particular, we figure out what parts of it are problematic enough to be worth banning, and ban those: I.E. the heavily biased algorithm which users have no control over.

Aside from that, theres also the option of providing alternatives. Said alternatives don't even have to be publicly run. It could come in the form of something like a one-time grant to Mastrodon and opening up a server exclusively for government departments to share announcements or PR with the public.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

+1.

This just suggests to censor us. I'm all for an open and free internet. If you censor it, you look ight as well join the book burning club.

Education is key. Just look at what they doing in the United St... Oh wait, nevermind.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

America is the best example that you just can't teach some people. Doesn't matter if it is scientists and doctors doing the teaching. If anything in the eyes of idiots that makes them even less credible. Don't underestimate stupidity.

[–] suzune@ani.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I honestly know what you mean. But I have my principles. It's not good to use censorship to fight disinformation. It's a social problem and it's better to fight the root cause, not the symptoms.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

That nice in theory but hasn't worked in practice.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Except that it doesn't work. The most effective way to shut down a movement is to prevent it from existing in the first place, not to reeducate millions.

[–] suzune@ani.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every time some entity introduces censorship-like measures, the internet gets slightly worse. And I mean it from a technological perspective.

I don't like to lose good things, just because there are some morons out there.

If you can navigate masses towards X, you can also do it in the opposite direction.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So where do you draw the line then?

Can't ban websites selling drugs or with CSAM, just in case?

[–] suzune@ani.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You shouldn't ban websites. You should get the criminals.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, that's completely ridiculous.

[–] suzune@ani.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's more ridiculous to believe that fighting crime is confiscating cars, block websites or similar things without catching the ones who cause the crimes.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not the one here saying pedos should be left alone until we can find them 🀷

[–] suzune@ani.social 0 points 10 months ago

I'm the one saying "find the criminals". That's the priority.

Please note, I am not saying that you shouldn't delete illegal material or confiscate drugs or whatever.

I am saying you shouldn't block pages, because the material is still there and the pedo, too. You have done essentially nothing, except harming the internet infrastructure.

[–] Two2Tango@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I get updates on X from my local news and police stations about traffic, weather, etc. We'd need to get this type of stuff into another single platform before many people would switch.

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How will they switch if they're already consolidated where they are? People are employed to manage these accounts, it'll just be their responsibility to migrate to the new platform.

[–] Two2Tango@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

That's the problem, we need a platform that's popular enough to catch their attention/make it worth the effort to post twice - which is half the reason anyone is still using Twitter. Trust me, I'm no fan of it and I avoid the comment section like the plague :/

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

If you have to use Twitter I recommend using squawker if you have android. Unfollow everyone from Twitter just use squawker to subscribe to accounts which provides a subscription feed that is local without adding the account followers.

Not a good idea to use the official Twitter app anyways with all the data collecting it can do and adding to follower counts adds added pressure to keep a presence there. Just turn into a ghost when it comes to Twitter usage.